Such a public battle could have left everyone involved bruised. But investors seem to have decided that no one lost, rewarding all three companies. Least surprising was the 12% leap in Netflix’s stock price on news of the deal. Wall Street had thought all along that WBD was an overpriced acquisition. (Netflix would have paid $83 billion to WBD.) Investors were glad to see the streamer put aside its ambition of owning the traditional Hollywood studio. As for WBD itself, investors clearly felt Paramount was paying a decent price for the entire company. On news of the deal, WBD stock barely budged; it was almost exactly where it had been in December when the whole fray began.
Anthropic 指出三家里流量最大的是 MiniMax，约 1300 万次，目标是代理编码、工具调用和复杂任务编排。
，这一点在服务器推荐中也有详细论述
Abstract:Package managers are legion. Every programming language and operating system has its own solution, each with subtly different semantics for dependency resolution. This fragmentation prevents multilingual projects from expressing precise dependencies across language ecosystems; it leaves external system and hardware dependencies implicit and unversioned; it obscures security vulnerabilities that lie in the full dependency graph. We present the \textit{Package Calculus}, a formalism for dependency resolution that unifies the core semantics of diverse package managers. Through a series of formal reductions, we show how this core is expressive enough to model the diversity that real-world package managers employ in their dependency expression languages. By using the Package Calculus as the intermediate representation of dependencies, we enable translation between distinct package managers and resolution across ecosystems.
I signed anonymously but now want to put my name on it. How can I fix that?